🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to establish different wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.